New Jersey's
Corrupt State and Municipal Officials
are protected by criminals in control of Government

Like most all the corrupt New Jersey cops.


Our latest: Corrupt N.J. Attorney General's Farber's boy friend who had 10 suspended licenses and had the 11 voided when she showed up with our State Trooper.
N.J.'s Corrupt officials are above the law.
Disgraced McGreevy's State Trooper Superintendent Joseph J. Santiago violated
Federal and State laws obtaining
protected investigatory files
staying free with a pat on the wrist.

Almost every State or Municipal employee I had the misfortune to meet during my five year investigation was corrupt especially the Police Officers. Developers are free to commit criminal acts and are protected by many in New Jersey's corrupt executive branch. New Jersey's a pathetic, horrendous criminal enterprise. Our Governor's Constituent Support's response on Jul 18, 2006 was no Government employee can help any victim report a crime. You must spend thousands of dollars of your money to hire a lawyer to figure out the right criminal codes and as the Victim can go suck on that.

New Jersey's State Motto below should be on posted all the corruptly built bill boards our prior scandal ridden Gov. James E. McGreevy's corrupt Chief of Staff Taffet and Chief Counsel Paul Levinsohn built making $2.2 Million in unknown billboard deals

New Jersey's State Motto
Criminals come to NJ's haven
and join with the other
thousands of criminals

Though the courts, after I learn the criminal codes, I am going to make your green light vanish just like your employment in Government.

Corrupt Municipal Judges, Prosecutors, Federal, State and Municipal Officials,
Professional Engineers and Planners and others

In New Jersey, the New Jersey Constitutional Rights do not apply to its citizens.

Below are a few of the rights which the corrupt Government of New Jersey has denied me in its corrupt State and Municipal government's on-slaught against the people.

  • Thomas John James Caggiano Background The corrupt officials shall now be removed by the dozens in Federal, State and Municipal Government and the Courts. A DOD Project Management Engineer position exists in no State Government as to protect our Nation, they are assigned the authority to ignor all jurisdictions in our support of the Commander-in-Chief and can send any appropriate embassary to see the President of the United States if needed to eliminate any threat to the people. As a citizen, you have even greater powers for it is your duty to report criminal activity and destroy tryannical government.



    The almighty God has given you an immortal soul
    fear no man, no weapon, no earthly danger.

    Matthew 5:10 "Blessed are they who suffer persecution for justice sake:
    for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven."



    New Jersey Constitution:

    We, the people of the State of New Jersey, grateful to Almighty God for the civil and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy, and looking to Him for a blessing upon our endeavors to secure and transmit the same unimpaired to succeeding generations, do ordain and establish this Constitution.


    ARTICLE I RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES

    1. All persons are by nature free and independent, and have certain natural and unalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and of pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness.


    2. a. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people
    6. Every person may freely speak, write and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right. No law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all prosecutions or indictments for libel, the truth may be given in evidence to the jury; and if it shall appear to the jury that the matter charged as libelous is true, and was published with good motives and for justifiable ends, the party shall be acquitted; and the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the fact.
    10. In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury; to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel in his defense.
    18. The people have the right freely to assemble together, to consult for the common good, to make known their opinions to their representatives, and to petition for redress of grievances.
    22. A victim of a crime shall be treated with fairness, compassion and respect by the criminal justice system. A victim of a crime shall not be denied the right to be present at public judicial proceedings except when, prior to completing testimony as a witness, the victim is properly sequestered in accordance with law or the Rules Governing the Courts of the State of New Jersey. A victim of a crime shall be entitled to those rights and remedies as may be provided by the Legislature.


    Whereas after being convicted six times at the hands of New Jersey's corrupt Courts and State Government employees, have a permanent criminal record, been on two years supervised probation, fined thousands of dollars, had to get the State's permission every time I visited my father or brother for more then a few hours, had my foreign travel rights eliminated so I could not even go to the Canadian side of Niagara Falls, paid thousands of dollars in legal defense fees, been finger-printed by the State as a criminal, designated an inmate, had the State order me to scrap thick layers of old-based lead paint off walls raining down upon my head and body without any protection, had all my voting rights taked away for two years, been hand-cuffed in Hopatcong's Police Station with the evidence on the table, had Stanhope's Police bang on my door at night terrorizing by wife who has a brain disease who was tortured for years, been placed into a five point restraint system, placed into an involutary mental clinic as I complained about the corruption with the evidence in my hands, refused to be transferred to jail for my protection as I was drugged against my wishes and had my red blood cells reduced 50% by a known side effect of the many drugs the New Jersey State Government forced upon me, sent thousands of faxes, was placed into the Sherrif's Labor Assistance Program (SLAP) for 15 days shoveling snow and picking up tens of miles of trash, been labeled repeatedly a criminal by corrupt Municipal and State government, been labeled a terrorist, paid thousands in OPRA bills, having the criminals still brazenly operate as of Jul 19, 2006, been denied by two different judges my right to call any witnesses in my defense in two kangaroo courts, developed a web site with the corrupt officials own voices, provided over 3,000 pages of evidence, paid hundreds of dollars in copying costs and postage, had our complete neighborhood of citizens terrorized and afraid of our government, had children screaming from fear, have adults afraid of our corrupt Police force, have adults afraid to have their grandchildren visit, had properities adversely impacted by boulders, floods, mud and sinkholes, had large shade trees destroyed, had 911 calls subverted, had our Federal and State representatives ignored, been published in the Newspaper over four years ago, had the Federal Government's U.S. Attorney's Office, had the FBI tell me if I brought them the evidence they would charged me as a criminal for trespass, had the State Government's corrupt employee John Maher, Janet Gore in my house as well as Stanhope's corrupt Arlene Fisher and seeing the evidence and having it ignored, State Police and the courts used against us, having been told by the Governor's Constituant's Office on Jul 19, 2006 and the Superior Court's Ombudsman there is NOTHING they can do for the victim as the victim must pay thousands of dollars to hire their own lawyer to report the criminal conduct!

    And whereas, the criminals are still upon us in more brazen criminal conduct then ever before in our faces.

    Therefore, I shall read the legal books by the dozen and use the court systems for the next decade filing hundreds of criminal cases against those on the below list which keeps growing.

    You'll be seeing lots of me testifying against you in court and if the prosecutor goes for a plea bargin, I'll just keep on filing different criminal charges a year later.

    Yours truly, a citizen doing his duty, eliminating the plague upon us:

    Namely You - Members of our corrupt governments

    Signed Thomas John James Caggiano on Jul 21, 2006


    Federal Government

  • Newark's U.S. Attorney's Office Special Prosecution's Chief Mr. James Nobile

    Department of the Attorney General and the Department of Criminal Justice

  • Corrupt New Jersey's Attorney General Ms. Zulima Farber

    Corrupt New Jersey's Department of Criminal Justice

  • Corrupt Director Gregg Paw
  • Corrupt AAG Louise Lester Chief Special Prosecutions Branch who I displeasure to meet May 11, 2006
  • Corrupt Edgar Hess
  • Corrupt Det Sgt Miles Capiello

    Office of Government Integrity The corrupt protectorate of Government employees

  • Corrupt executive director Tracy Thompson
  • Corrupt DAG Alan Epstein

    Corrupt Netcong State Police Troop 8

  • I just don't have the two officers names yet as they both refused to tell me their names.

    State Commission of Investigation The Protectorate of corrupt Borough Engineers and inspectors

  • Incompetent to corrupt Mr. Alan Rockoff.
  • Corrupt Janet Gore a staff member who visited my house for 1 hour


    The Department of Community Affairs which ignored over 3,000 pages of evidence for years

  • Commissioner Susan Bass Levin who has ignored a letter from the Governor's Office for over 3 months regarding a requested investigation of the Borough of Stanhope
  • Deputy Commissioner and prior Acting Commissioner Charles Richman who was the Commissioner of DCA and ignored over 3,000 pages of evidence.


  • DCA's Codes and Stds Department: The protectorate for corrupt Construction Code Officials

  • Director William Connelly
  • Supervisor of Regulator Affairs Louis Mraw
  • Supervisor of Investigations Gerald Grayce
  • Investigator John Maher who was in my home for 1 hour and refused to see the 4 ft of evidence in the next room and he willfully mislead the Sussex County Prosecutor's Office and prepared a whitewash report on the corrupt Construction Code Official Thomas Pershouse who the corrupt Codes and Standard's Department has protected for years.


  • DCA's Government Record Council:
  • Prior employee Gloria Luzzatto Operations Manager who lied to the GRC panel members that the Borough of Stanhope responded to my written requests for copies of documents as the Statement of Information on pages 6,7 and 8 were blank and not filled in as to existance of required legal documents or their non-existance.
  • Its three GRC Board Members or their designees ordered in the State Trooper SGT Wilkins as I stated my New Jersey constitutional rights and brought in Sgt Wilkins to stop me from presenting evidence against the Borough of Stanhope and other government agencies. The official minutes do not state the vehement statements I made as to the tryanny in Stanhope and the corruption of the Department of Criminal Justice, HQ, Department of Agricuture and Sussex County Soil Conservation District which were apparent criminal acts by the GRC panel members to prevent detection and apprehension of the Criminal conduct of these New Jersey State agencies; 2C:29-3.a.7 and 2C:29-1.

  • DCA's Department of Local Government: The protectorate of corrupt municipal governments

  • Deputy Director Marc Pfeiffer who I met in Dec 2005 and told him to his face, the reports by SCPO's corrupt Detective Joseph Costello an the Borough of Stanhope forever lying to all investigators its corrupt Town Administrator Teresa Massood who wrote the letters banning me from Stanhope which were determined to be illegal on May 11, 2006 is still signing criminal invoices by John Cilo Jr. Associates and Omland Engineering Associates and the corrupt Mayor's and Governing Body's henchwoman who always deletes requests for her removal per Chapter 2.2.D which the corrupt Borough Attorney Richard A. Stein esq. stated does not even exist and like her and others knew the development was illegal on Jan 8, 2002 and have cooperated in obstruction of justice, false statements, denial of acces and too many other crimes as I alone must look up the criminal codes for no one in State Government is allowed to assist the victim determine the criminal codes to file a criminal report which Stanhope Police to write up any way in their own Police Station and the Court Clerk Lorraine Lupo stated: "Go hire a lawyer" as well as the Governor's Office. To report a crime in this State you need a lawyer and if you attempt to write one in Stanhope's corrupt Police station the officer refused you to prepare one, refused to state his name when you put the digital recorder to his face and ask him his name so I read it from his name tag as he participated in the criminal conspiracy by constantly being on the telephone with our corrupt Chief of Police Steven Pittenger.

  • Other corrupt Local Government Officals are:
  • Joesph Valenti
  • Ethics Officer: Ms. Mc Namara who ignored a foot of evidence I sent to that office as they complained to me that I sent them too much information.


    Corrupt Sussex County Prosecutor's Office The protectorate of corrupt Government officials

  • Prosecutor David Weaver
  • First Assistant Prosecutor William Fitzgibbons who wrote I wrote Mary Pawar's handwritten letter which described the criminal conduct
  • Detective Joseph Costello who lied to the Department of Community Affairs, Mary Pawar and myself.

    Corrupt Department of Consumer Affairs: The protectorate of corrupt Professional Engineers as John Cilo Jr. presented evidence of his own guilt and others in his submission of Jul 5, 2002 and the Board member grabbed the Jul 29, 2002 letter that John Cilo Jr. himself wrote to the prior owner E.N.F. Development Co. Franklin Dawalt Jr. after the illegal certificate of occupancy was issued on Jul 10, 2002, the property sold on Jul 12, 2002 and the Jul 27, 2002 meeting among Iqbal and Mary Pawar, Joseph Lamicella and myself on her deck on Jul 27, 2002 wherein John Cilo Jr. after lying three times admitted the wall was not on the site plan and did not met code. The wall was a criminal act 2C:33-12.a and a felony punishable up to a year in jail. Despite the evidence, a letter from 14 property owners, Cilo's own photographs of the criminal acts which include the destruction of shade trees has not has his license even suspended as of Aug 29, 2006 as John Cilo Jr. still commits incompetent and criminal acts as he has no contract and violates the Map Filing Law and other laws as the Land Use Board, Town Coucnil, Mayor, Borough Attorney and Town Administrator all continue to commit Official Misconduct 2C:30-2.b, pay invalid claims and continue to commit crimes with impunity.

  • Corrupt Board of Engineers' President Edward Vernick
  • All other Board of Professional Engineers members.

    Completely corrupt Dept of Agriculture: The protectorate of developers and municipal goverment

  • Secretary of Agriculture: Charles Miles Kuperus and his assistant Ms. Tovar
  • Director of Agriculture: Monique Purcell
  • Executive Secretary of the State Soil Conservation Committee: James Sadley and his corrupt associate Frank Minch who ignored then deleted over 100 emails and letters of adverse impacts from all the adjacent property owners.

    State of New Jersey's completely Corrupt Sussex County Soil Conservation District

  • Board of Supervisors: Fred Hough, Walter Ricker and Barbara Rusko
  • Completely Corrupt Chairmen, Attorney and prior Mayor of Hopatcong Clifford Lundin
  • Corrupt Manager Winifred Straub
  • SCSCD's corrupt lawyer and District Attorney Brian Smith
  • Three field inspectors: Krause, Egbert and Morris
  • SCSCD's corrupt consulting PE Joseph Sedivy whose contract was not awarded per the Local Public Contracts Law and does review of calculations in his head that were never submitted.

    New Jersey's Department of Environmental Protection doesn't know a wetland permit has general provisions that are clearly violated as a wetland is buried before a certified SESCP even exists and ignors letters by fourteen property owners as I got a sinkhole on my property as the wetland was buried without drainage.

  • Scott Brubaker
  • Mike Nystrom

    Borough of Stanhope with dozens of corrupt government employees

    excluding its Municipal Clerk and OPRA custodian Ms. Robin Kline who works in a criminal environment

  • Treasonous Mayor Diana Kuncken

  • Corrupt Judge John Mulhern who doesn't allow witnesses to be called in your defense

  • Corrupt Stanhope Town Council's Governing Body members:

  • Brian Murphy
  • Michael Vance
  • Jack Mohrle
  • Raymond Wootten
  • James Benson
  • Edward Schwartz

  • Henchwoman Town Administrator Terersa Massood

  • Corrupt Borough Attorney and Municipal Prosecutor Richard A. Stein (Laddey, Clark and Ryan PA)

  • Corrupt Chief of Police Steven Pittenger, SGT Charles Zweigle and Patrolman Robert Popelka

  • Corrupt Land Use Board

  • Chairman John Maguire
  • Land Use Board attorney Roger Thomas (Dolan and Dolan PA)
  • James Benson also a corrupt Town Council member and a corrupt Finance Committee member
  • Janice Hunts
  • Ray Wootten also a corrupt Town Council member
  • Donald Drake
  • Dave Hoyt
  • Thomas Pershouse also corrupt Construction Code Official
  • Joseph Torelli

  • Paula Zeliff-Murphyp>

  • Corrupt Code Enforcement Official Arlene Fisher

  • Corrupt Finance CFO Joseph Kovalski

  • Corrupt Construction Code Official Thomas Pershouse and member of Land Use Board who stated to the corrupt Codes and Standards inspector John Maher who knew he was lied to by the corrupt Construction Code official who was told to stop all construction immediately on Jan 8, 2002 as laws were not complied with and that a Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan was required as stated in the deeds themselves when the resolution making the subdivision with Lot Area variance was agreed with the prior owner and the Borough of Stanhope. No approved and certified Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the project has ever existed which is a clear violation of many State laws and municipal laws which have been ignored by all State authoriies and municipal government on a continuous basis.

    The illegal development on Block 10902 Lot 10 and 12, 2 and 6 Oak Drive was a two lot minor sub-division that had critical slope variancea on both lots, a Lot size variance, over 20,000 sq ft disturbed, an eighteen foot wide conservation area to protect the Valley Road properties from flooding and the high water table and a wetland. No as-built drawings required for each lot to be approved before a certificate of occupancy were ever made. Laws have been violated with complete impunity for over 4 years. No required Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (SESCPs) approved by the Municipality and certified by the State's Sussex County Soil Conservation District (SCSCD) prior to undertaking developing and issuing a certificate of occupancy for the project was ever made. The only two SESCPs certified by SCSCD were only for Block 10902 Lot 10, both were criminally false, blatantly obvious ficticious plans as neither had two walls, one built in the conservation easement after the first of two illegally issued certificates of occupancies were issued as the Borough of Stanhope and the Department of Agriculture conspired with other State Agencies to defraud the two home owners of 2 and 6 Oak Drive as they both have encumbered deeds as the properties violate the restricted deeds and both walls must be removed to comply with the site plan as stated by all the surrounding property owners in our petition to the Corrupt Borough of Stanhope on July 25, 2002 and again on May 8, 2006 which has been ignored by all State agencies as of Jul 21, 2006 as municipal, state and federal laws were violated and the Wetland Permit's general conditions were violated with hundreds of unreported violations as the Borough of Stanhope and SCSCD are totally corrupt supported by other corrupt State agencies, municipal courts and others identified herein in a four year criminal conspiracy.

    Hopatcong

  • Corrupt Hopatcong Judge C. Williman Bowkley Jr.

  • Corrupt Prosecutor Anthony Arbori

  • Other Police officers who handcuffed me with evidence on the table

  • Corrupt Hopatcong Officer Lt. Mike Siciliano regarding 911 call to protect the corrupt Stanhope Police Department

    Corrupt firm: Omland Engineering Associates

  • Corrupt President Stanley T. Omland PE/PP
  • Corrupt Vice President Eric Keller PE/PP who has no contact.

    Corrupt firm: John Cilo Jr. Associates

  • Corrupt PE John Cilo Jr. a consultant with no contract
  • Corrupt Scarllet Doyle Stanhope's PP who also has no contract.

    Corrupt firm: Pittenger & Keith Inc

  • Corrupt PE Wendell Inhoffer prepares two criminally false SESCPs
  • Corrupt PP Judith Keith prepares criminally false SESCP and false memorandum

    Corrupt E.N.F. Development Co. LLC.'s owner Franklin Dawalt Jr.

    Corrupt PE Peter Schneider certifies two walls an none exist on any plan

  • If you come to
    the corrupt, shit hole
    called
    State of New Jersey
    bring plenty of wipes
    and
    a cloths pin for your nose.

        Primary Nutrients (pounds per ton)
    Type of Manure Water Content Nitrogen Phosphate Potash
    Cow, horse 60%-80% 12-14 5-9 9-12
    Sheep, pig, goat 65%-75% 10-21 7 13-19
    Chicken:        
    Wet, sticky, and caked 75% 30 20 10
    Moist, crumbly to sticky 50% 40 40 20
    Crumbly 30% 60 55 30
    Dry 15% 90 70 40
    Ashed   none 135 100

    Some of the CRIMINAL CODES I found so far have as I have to read seven more law books I recently purcahsed and with the help of the Superior Court's Law Library and its Law Clerk determine how many dozens of criminal charges I can file against each of the above corrupt people as they will be hundreds of criminal charges filed for years to come.

    I have lots more Legal research to do to determine all the criminal codes and lay out a strategy of presenting my nine feet of evidence during the next decade as I will present different criminal charges against the individuals for the next decade.

    In New Jersey by law iNO government official in the court system or the executive branch of government is allowed to assist the victim define criminal charges against criminals?

    It's against New Jersey State law. No wonder we have so many corrupt criminals in govenment.

    The victim is on his own and has to figure out the criminal codes, pay the expensive legal fees, go through the efforts, be charged as a criminal and convicted by the criminals!

    So below are just a starter:

    2C:30-2.b Official Misconduct He knowingly refrains from performing a duty which is imposed upon him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office.

    2C:33-12.a Maintaining a Nuisance
    By conduct either lawful in itself .. Knowingly creates or maintains a condition which endangers the safety or health of a considerable number of people by exposing owners and visitors of 6 Oak Drive, 3 and 5 Valley Road to rocks and possible full collapse of large amount of heavily surcharged wall 1 wall that had no compressed footing, no toe-in, built with too much earth and not 2 over 1 construction and in violations of Stanhope Municipal Code 100-58C Walls

    2C:28-7.a Tampering with public records or information wherein the actor’s purpose is to defraud or injure anyone.

    2C:29-1 Obstructing Administration of Law or Other Government Function By obstruction the detection or investigation of a crime

    2C:28-4.b False reports to Law Enforcement Authorities Fictitious reports

    2C:29-3 a.7 Hindering Apprehension or Prosecution

    I expect to have at least 40 different criminal codes for the nine feet of evidence I have against several dozen corrupt municipal, state and federal officials.


    Some of the legal law books obtained were:

  • The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation by Harvard Law Review
  • Criminal Law and its Processes
  • Basic Legal Research: Tools and Strategies
  • Writing and Analysis in the Law
  • Plain English for Lawyers

  • My review of the penalities to maximize your conviction penalities has already begun. Here for the criminals listed above is some information for your information.

    After reading the seven books I ordered and another dozen, I will be able to effectively plan a ten year strategy for each person listed above to maximize the time you send in jail using unique mathematical models with a maximization function I shall develop that the legal profession will not have a clue of the sophisticated model's development as it will be unique, be supported by an a extensive undisclosed time based network analysis of cases, penalities and the nine feet of evidence I have to present different criminal charges at times of my election against each person or an array of criminals based upon my legal/penality based math model where the penality for each person is maximized over the time limit to bring the charges.

    Scientific theory shall be applied for a maximum cost and time based penality which is rather simple really compared to the engineering analysis I did for thirty years.After spending five years getting the evidence against the corrupt officials, I am now prepared to spend the next ten years eradicating them and it will make an interesting study for the free college courses I am preparing using the Work BreakDown Structure techniques.

    For your benefit a typical mathematical optimization model for the penalities is easily performed in Euclidean space as indicated by clicking on this link

    2C:1-1.  Short title;  rules of construction

        a.  This Title shall be known and may be cited as the  "New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice."
        b.  Except as provided in subsections c. and d. of this section, the code does not apply to offenses committed prior to its effective date and prosecutions and dispositions for such offenses shall be governed by the prior law, which is continued in effect for that purpose, as if this code were not in  force.  For the purposes of this section, an offense was committed after the  effective date of the code if any of the elements of the offenses occurred  subsequent thereto.
        c.  In any case pending on or initiated after the effective date of the code  involving an offense committed prior to such date:
        (1) The procedural provisions of the code shall govern, insofar as they are  justly applicable and their application does not introduce confusion or delay;
        (2) The court, with the consent of the defendant, may impose sentence under  the provisions of the code applicable to the offense and the offender.
        (3) The court shall, if the offense committed is no longer an offense under  the provisions of the code, dismiss such prosecution.
        d.  (1) The provisions of the code governing the treatment and the release or discharge of prisoners, probationers and parolees shall apply to persons under sentence for offenses committed prior to the effective date of the code, except that the minimum or maximum period of their detention or supervision shall in no case be increased.
        (2) Any person who is under sentence of imprisonment on the effective date of the code for an offense committed prior to the effective date which has been  eliminated by the code or who has been sentenced to a maximum term of imprisonment for an offense committed prior to the effective date which exceeds  the maximum established by the code for such an offense and who, on said  effective date, has not had his sentence suspended or been paroled or discharged, may move to have his sentence reviewed by the sentencing court and the court may impose a new sentence, for good cause shown as though the person had been convicted under the code, except that no period of detention or supervision shall be increased as a result of such resentencing.
        e.  The provisions of the code not inconsistent with those of prior laws shall be construed as a continuation of such laws.
        f.  The classification and arrangement of the several sections of the code have been made for the purpose of convenience, reference and orderly arrangement, and therefore no implication or presumption of a legislative construction is to be drawn therefrom.
        g.  In the construction of the code, or any part thereof, no outline or analysis of the contents of said title or of any subtitle, chapter, article or section, no cross-reference or cross-reference note and no headnote or source note to any section shall be deemed to be a part of the code.
        h.  If said title or any subtitle, chapter, article or section of the code,  or any provision thereof, shall be declared to be unconstitutional, invalid or  inoperative in whole or in part, by a court of competent jurisdiction, such  title, subtitle, chapter, article, section or provision shall, to the extent  that it is not unconstitutional, invalid or inoperative, be enforced and  effectuated, and no such determination shall be deemed to invalidate or make  ineffectual the remaining provisions of the title, or of any subtitle, chapter,  article or section of the code.
         L.1978, c. 95, s. 2C:1-1, eff. Sept. 1, 1979.  Amended by L.1979, c. 178, s. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1979.
     

    2C:1-2.      Purposes; principles of construction

    a.   The general purposes of the provisions governing the definition of offenses are:
        (1)  To forbid, prevent, and condemn conduct that unjustifiably and inexcusably inflicts or threatens serious harm to individual or public interests; 
        (2)  To insure the public safety by preventing the commission of offenses through the deterrent influence of the sentences authorized, the rehabilitation of those convicted, and their confinement when required in the interests of public protection; 
        (3)  To subject to public control persons whose conduct indicates that they are disposed to commit offenses; 
        (4)  To give fair warning of the nature of the conduct proscribed and of the sentences authorized upon conviction; 
        (5)  To differentiate on reasonable grounds between serious and minor offenses; and
        (6)  To define adequately the act and mental state which constitute each offense, and limit the condemnation of conduct as criminal when it is without fault. 

    b.   The general purposes of the provisions governing the sentencing of offenders are: 
        (1)  To prevent and condemn the commission of offenses;
        (2)  To promote the correction and rehabilitation of offenders;
        (3)  To insure the public safety by preventing the commission of offenses through the deterrent influence of sentences imposed and the confinement of offenders when required in the interest of public protection; 
        (4)  To safeguard offenders against excessive, disproportionate or arbitrary punishment;
        (5)  To give fair warning of the nature of the sentences that may be imposed on conviction of an offense; 
        (6)  To differentiate among offenders with a view to a just individualization in their treatment; 
        (7)  To advance the use of generally accepted scientific methods and knowledge in sentencing offenders; and 
      (8)  To promote restitution to victims.

    Find your criminal codes below as I'll be reseaching every code that is applicable then start reviewing federal and muncipal civil and criminal codes:

    Searchable 2C New Jersey Criminal Code


     

    New Jersey Criminal Penalties

    Listed below are the sections of the New Jersey Criminal Code that apply to penalties for criminal offenses. The application of these statutes depends on specific facts in a case. Although you can review these statutes for general information, please contact us directly so that we can advise you of the potential penalties in your situation.

    2C:43-1.     Degrees of crimes
    a. Crimes defined by this code are classified, for the purpose of sentence, into four degrees, as follows:
    (1) Crimes of the first degree;
    (2) Crimes of the second degree;
    (3) Crimes of the third degree; and
    (4) Crimes of the fourth degree.
    A crime is of the first, second, third or fourth degree when it is so designated by the code.  An offense, declared to be a crime, without specification of degree, is of the fourth degree.
    b. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a crime defined by any statute of this State other than this code and designated as a high misdemeanor shall constitute for the purpose of sentence a crime of the third degree.  Except as provided in sections 2C:1-4c. and 2C:1-5b. and notwithstanding any other provision of law, a crime defined by any statute of this State other than this code and designated as a misdemeanor shall constitute for the purpose of sentence a crime of the fourth degree.

    2C:43-2     Sentence in accordance with code; authorized dispositions.
    a. Except as otherwise provided by this code, all persons convicted of an offense or offenses shall be sentenced in accordance with this chapter.
    b.Except as provided in subsection a. of this section and subject to the applicable provisions of the code, the court may suspend the imposition of sentence on a person who has been convicted of an offense, or may sentence him as follows:
    To pay a fine or make restitution authorized by N.J.S.2C:43-3 or P.L.1997, c.253 (C.2C:43-3.4 et al.); or
    Except as provided in subsection g. of this section, to be placed on probation and, in the case of a person convicted of a crime, to imprisonment for a term fixed by the court not exceeding 364 days to be served as a condition of probation, or in the case of a person convicted of a disorderly persons offense, to imprisonment for a term fixed by the court not exceeding 90 days to be served as a condition of probation; or
    To imprisonment for a term authorized by sections 2C:11-3, 2C:43-5, 2C:43-6, 2C:43-7, and 2C:43-8 or 2C:44-5; or
    To pay a fine, make restitution and probation, or fine, restitution and imprisonment; or
    To release under supervision in the community or to require the performance of community-related service; or
    To a halfway house or other residential facility in the community, including agencies which are not operated by the Department of Human Services; or
    To imprisonment at night or on weekends with liberty to work or to participate in training or educational programs.
    Instead of or in addition to any disposition made according to this section, the court may postpone, suspend, or revoke for a period not to exceed two years the driver's license, registration certificate, or both of any person convicted of a crime, disorderly persons offense, or petty disorderly persons offense in the course of which a motor vehicle was used. In imposing this disposition and in deciding the duration of the postponement, suspension, or revocation, the court shall consider the severity of the crime or offense and the potential effect of the loss of driving privileges on the person's ability to be rehabilitated.  Any postponement, suspension, or revocation shall be imposed consecutively with any custodial sentence.
    This chapter does not deprive the court of any authority conferred by law to decree a forfeiture of property, suspend or cancel a license, remove a person from office, or impose any other civil penalty.  Such a judgment or order may be included in the sentence.
    The court shall state on the record the reasons for imposing the sentence, including its findings pursuant to the criteria for withholding or imposing imprisonment or fines under sections 2C:44-1 to 2C:44-3, where imprisonment is imposed, consideration of the defendant's eligibility for release under the law governing parole and the factual basis supporting its findings of particular aggravating or mitigating factors affecting sentence.
    The court shall explain the parole laws as they apply to the sentence and shall state:
    the approximate period of time in years and months the defendant will serve in custody before parole eligibility;
    the jail credits or the amount of time the defendant has already served;
    that the defendant may be entitled to good time and work credits; and
    that the defendant may be eligible for participation in the Intensive Supervision Program.
    Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (2) of subsection b. of this section, a court imposing sentence on a defendant who has been convicted of any offense enumerated in subsection a. of section 2 of P.L.1994, c.130 (C.2C:43-6.4) may not sentence the defendant to be placed on probation.

    2C:43-3     Fines and restitutions
    A person who has been convicted of an offense may be sentenced to pay a fine, to make restitution, or both, such fine not to exceed:
    a. (1) $200,000.00 when the conviction is of a crime of the first degree;
    (2) $150,000.00 when the conviction is of a crime of the second degree;
    b. (1) $15,000.00 when the conviction is of a crime of the third degree;
    (2)  $10,000.00 when the conviction is of a crime of the fourth degree;
    c.  $1,000.00, when the conviction is of a disorderly persons offense;
    d.  $500.00, when the conviction is of a petty disorderly persons offense;
    e.  Any higher amount equal to double the pecuniary gain to the offender or loss to the victim caused by the conduct constituting the offense by the offender.  In such case the court shall make a finding as to the amount of the gain or loss, and if the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support such a finding the court may conduct a hearing upon the issue.  For purposes of this section the term "gain" means the amount of money or the value of property derived by the offender and "loss" means the amount of value separated from the victim or the amount of any payment owed to the victim and avoided or evaded and includes any reasonable and necessary expense incurred by the owner in recovering or replacing lost, stolen or damaged property, or recovering any payment avoided or evaded, and, with respect to property of a research facility, includes the cost of repeating an interrupted or invalidated experiment or loss of profits.  The term "victim" shall mean a person who suffers a personal physical or psychological injury or death or incurs loss of or injury to personal or real property as a result of a crime committed against that person, or in the case of a homicide, the nearest relative of the victim.  The terms "gain" and "loss" shall also mean, where appropriate, the amount of any tax, fee, penalty and interest avoided, evaded, or otherwise unpaid or improperly retained or disposed of;
    f.  Any higher amount specifically authorized by another section of this code or any other statute;
    g.  Up to twice the amounts authorized in subsection a., b., c. or d. of this section, in the case of a second or subsequent conviction of any tax offense defined in Title 54 of the Revised Statutes or Title 54A of the New Jersey Statutes, as amended and supplemented, or of any offense defined in chapter 20 or 21 of this code;
    h.  In the case of violations of chapter 35, any higher amount equal to three times the street value of the controlled dangerous substance or controlled substance analog.  The street value for purposes of this section shall be determined pursuant to subsection e. of N.J.S.2C:44-2.
    The restitution ordered paid to the victim shall not exceed the victim's loss, except that in any case involving the failure to pay any State tax, the amount of restitution to the State shall be the full amount of the tax avoided or evaded, including full civil penalties and interest as provided by law.  In any case where the victim of the offense is any department or division of State government, the court shall order restitution to the victim.  Any restitution imposed on a person shall be in addition to any fine which may be imposed pursuant to this section.

    2C:43-6.     Sentence of imprisonment for crime; ordinary terms; mandatory terms 
        2C:43-6.  Sentence of Imprisonment for Crime; Ordinary Terms; Mandatory Terms.  a.  Except as otherwise provided, a person who has been convicted of a crime may be sentenced to imprisonment, as follows: 

       (1)  In the case of a crime of the first degree, for a specific term of years which shall be fixed by the court and shall be between 10 years and 20 years; 

       (2)  In the case of a crime of the second degree, for a specific term of years which shall be fixed by the court and shall be between five years and 10 years; 

       (3)  In the case of a crime of the third degree, for a specific term of years which shall be fixed by the court and shall be between three years and five years; 

       (4)  In the case of a crime of the fourth degree, for a specific term which shall be fixed by the court and shall not exceed 18 months. 

       b.   As part of a sentence for any crime, where the court is clearly convinced that the aggravating factors substantially outweigh the mitigating factors, as set forth in subsections a. and b. of 2C:44-1, the court may fix a minimum term not to exceed one-half of the term set pursuant to subsection a., or one-half of the term set pursuant to a maximum period of incarceration for a crime set forth in any statute other than this code, during which the defendant shall not be eligible for parole; provided that no defendant shall be eligible for parole at a date earlier than otherwise provided by the law governing parole. 

       The minimum terms established by this section shall not prevent the court from imposing presumptive terms of imprisonment pursuant to 2C:44-1f. (1) except in cases of crimes of the fourth degree. 

       A person who has been convicted of an offense enumerated by this subsection and who used or possessed a firearm during its commission, attempted commission or flight therefrom and who has been previously convicted of an offense involving the use or possession of a firearm as defined in 2C:44-3d., shall be sentenced by the court to an extended term as authorized by 2C:43-7c., notwithstanding that extended terms are ordinarily discretionary with the court. 

       d.   The court shall not impose a mandatory sentence pursuant to subsection c. of this section, 2C:43-7c. or 2C:44-3d., unless the ground therefor has been established at a hearing.  At the hearing, which may occur at the time of sentencing, the prosecutor shall establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the weapon used or possessed was a firearm.  In making its finding, the court shall take judicial notice of any evidence, testimony or information adduced at the trial, plea hearing, or other court proceedings and shall also consider the presentence report and any other relevant information. 

       e.   A person convicted of a third or subsequent offense involving State taxes under N.J.S.2C:20-9, N.J.S.2C:21-15, any other provision of this code, or under any of the provisions of Title 54 of the Revised Statutes, or Title 54A of the New Jersey Statutes, as amended and supplemented, shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment by the court. This shall not preclude an application for and imposition of an extended term of imprisonment under N.J.S.2C:44-3 if the provisions of that section are applicable to the offender. 

       The court shall not impose an extended term pursuant to this subsection unless the ground therefor has been established at a hearing. At the hearing, which may occur at the time of sentencing, the prosecutor shall establish the ground therefor by a preponderance of the evidence. In making its finding, the court shall take judicial notice of any evidence, testimony or information adduced at the trial, plea hearing, or other court proceedings and shall also consider the presentence report and any other relevant information. 

       For the purpose of this subsection, a previous conviction exists where the actor has at any time been convicted under chapter 35 of this title or Title 24 of the Revised Statutes or under any similar statute of the United States, this State, or any other state for an offense that is substantially equivalent to N.J.S.2C:35-3, N.J.S.2C:35-4, N.J.S.2C:35-5, N.J.S.2C:35-6 or section 1 of P.L.1987, c.101 (C.2C:35-7). 

       g.   Any person who has been convicted under subsection a. of N.J.S.2C:39-4 of possessing a machine gun or assault firearm with intent to use it against the person of another, or of a crime under any of the following sections: N.J.S.2C:11-3, N.J.S.2C:11-4, N.J.S.2C:12-1b., N.J.S.2C:13-1, N.J.S.2C:14-2a., N.J.S.2C:14-3a., N.J.S.2C:15-1, N.J.S.2C:18-2, N.J.S.2C:29-5, N.J.S.2C:35-5, who, while in the course of committing or attempting to commit the crime, including the immediate flight therefrom, used or was in possession of a machine gun or assault firearm shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment by the court.  The term of imprisonment shall include the imposition of a minimum term.  The minimum term shall be fixed at 10 years for a crime of the first or second degree, five years for a crime of the third degree, or 18 months in the case of a fourth degree crime, during which the defendant shall be ineligible for parole. 

       The minimum terms established by this section shall not prevent the court from imposing presumptive terms of imprisonment pursuant to paragraph (1) of subsection f. of N.J.S.2C:44-1 for crimes of the first degree. 

       A person who has been convicted of an offense enumerated in this subsection and who used or possessed a machine gun or assault firearm during its commission, attempted commission or flight therefrom and who has been previously convicted of an offense involving the use or possession of any firearm as defined in subsection d. of N.J.S.2C:44-3, shall be sentenced by the court to an extended term as authorized by subsection d. of N.J.S.2C:43-7, notwithstanding that extended terms are ordinarily discretionary with the court. 

       h.   The court shall not impose a mandatory sentence pursuant to subsection g. of this section, subsections d. of N.J.S.2C:43-7 or N.J.S.2C:44-3, unless the ground therefor has been established at a hearing. At the hearing, which may occur at the time of sentencing, the prosecutor shall establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the weapon used or possessed was a machine gun or assault firearm.  In making its finding, the court shall take judicial notice of any evidence, testimony or information adduced at the trial, plea hearing, or other court proceedings and shall also consider the presentence report and any other relevant information. 

       i.   A person who has been convicted under paragraph (6) of subsection b. of 2C:12-1 of causing bodily injury while eluding shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment by the court.  The term of imprisonment shall include the imposition of a minimum term.  The minimum term shall be fixed at, or between one-third and one-half of the sentence imposed by the court.  The minimum term established by this subsection shall not prevent the court from imposing a presumptive term of imprisonment pursuant to paragraph (1) of subsection f. of 2C:44-1. 

       Amended 1979,c.178,s.85; 1981,c.31,s.1; 1981,c.290,s.38; 1981,c.569,s.1; 1982,c.119,s.1; 1987,c.76,s.35; 1987,c.106,s.12; 1988,c.44,s.13; 1990,c.32,s.6; 1993,c.219,s.6. 
     
    2C:43-6.2.     Probation; reduction of mandatory minimum term 
      1.     On a motion by the prosecutor made to the assignment judge that the imposition of a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment under (a) subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:43-6 for a defendant who has not previously been convicted of an offense under that subsection, or (b) subsection e. of N.J.S.2C:39-10 for a defendant who has not previously been convicted of an offense under chapter 39 of Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes, does not serve the interests of justice, the assignment judge shall place the defendant on probation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:43-2 or reduce to one year the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment during which the defendant will be ineligible for parole. The sentencing court may also refer a case of a defendant who has not previously been convicted of an offense under that subsection to the assignment judge, with the approval of the prosecutor, if the sentencing court believes that the interests of justice would not be served by the imposition of a mandatory minimum term. 

    L.1989,c.53,s.1; amended 1993,c.49,s.2. 

    2C:43-6.3.   Review of sentence
         Any person who, on the effective date of this act, is serving a mandatory minimum sentence as provided for by subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:43-6, who has not been previously convicted under that subsection, and has not had his sentence suspended or been paroled or discharged, may move to have his sentence reviewed by the assignment judge for the sentencing court.  If the prosecutor agrees that the sentence under review does not serve the interests of justice, the judge shall reduce the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment without parole eligibility to one year or place the person on probation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:43-2.

        L.1989, c.53, s.2.
     
    2C:43-6.4  Special sentence of parole supervision for life.

    2. a. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, a judge imposing sentence on a person who has been convicted of aggravated sexual assault, sexual assault, aggravated criminal sexual contact, kidnapping pursuant to paragraph (2) of subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:13-1, endangering the welfare of a child by engaging in sexual conduct which would impair or debauch the morals of the child pursuant to subsection a. of N.J.S.2C:24-4, endangering the welfare of a child pursuant to paragraph (3) of subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:24-4, luring or an attempt to commit any of these offenses shall include, in addition to any sentence authorized by this Code, a special sentence of parole supervision for life.

    b.The special sentence of parole supervision for life required by this section shall commence immediately upon the defendant's release from incarceration.  If the defendant is serving a sentence of incarceration for another offense at the time he completes the custodial portion of the sentence imposed on the present offense, the special sentence of parole supervision for life shall not commence until the defendant is actually released from incarceration for the other offense.  Persons serving a special sentence of parole supervision for life shall remain in the legal custody of the Commissioner of Corrections, shall be supervised by the Division of Parole of the State Parole Board, shall be subject to the provisions and conditions set forth in subsection c. of section 3 of P.L.1997, c.117 (C.30:4-123.51b) and sections 15 through 19 and 21 of P.L.1979, c.441 (C.30:4-123.59 through 30:4-123.63 and 30:4-123.65), and shall be subject to conditions appropriate to protect the public and foster rehabilitation.  If the defendant violates a condition of a special sentence of parole supervision for life, the defendant shall be subject to the provisions of sections 16 through 19 and 21 of P.L.1979, c.441 (C.30:4-123.60 through 30:4-123.63 and 30:4-123.65), and for the purpose of calculating the limitation on time served pursuant to section 21 of P.L.1979, c.441 (C.30:4-123.65)the custodial term imposed upon the defendant related to the special sentence of parole supervision for life shall be deemed to be a term of life imprisonment.  When the court suspends the imposition of sentence on a defendant who has been convicted of any offense enumerated in subsection a. of this section, the court may not suspend imposition of the special sentence of parole supervision for life, which shall commence immediately, with the Division of Parole of the State Parole Board maintaining supervision over that defendant, including the defendant's compliance with any conditions imposed by the court pursuant to N.J.S.2C:45-1, in accordance with the provisions of this subsection.  Nothing contained in this subsection shall prevent the court from at any time proceeding under the provisions of N.J.S.2C:45-1 through 2C:45-4 against any such defendant for a violation of any conditions imposed by the court when it suspended imposition of sentence, or prevent the Division of Parole from proceeding under the provisions of sections 16 through 19 and 21 of P.L.1979. c.441 (C.30:4-123.60 through 30:4-123.63 and C.30:4-123.65) against any such defendant for a violation of any conditions of the special sentence of parole supervision for life, including the conditions imposed by the court pursuant to N.J.S.2C:45-1.  In any such proceeding by the Division of Parole, the provisions of subsection c. of section 3 of P.L.1997, c.117 (C.30:4-123.51b) authorizing revocation and return to prison shall be applicable to such a defendant, notwithstanding that the defendant may not have been sentenced to or served any portion of a custodial term for conviction of an offense enumerated in subsection a. of this section.

    c.A person sentenced to a term of parole supervision for life may petition the Superior Court for release from that parole supervision. The judge may grant a petition for release from a special sentence of parole supervision for life only upon proof by clear and convincing evidence that the person has not committed a crime for 15 years since the last conviction or release from incarceration, whichever is later, and that the person is not likely to pose a threat to the safety of others if released from parole supervision.  Notwithstanding the provisions of section 22 of P.L.1979, c.441 (C.30:4-123.66), a person sentenced to a term of parole supervision for life may be released from that parole supervision term only by court order as provided in this subsection.

    d.A person who violates a condition of a special sentence imposed pursuant to this section without good cause is guilty of a crime of the fourth degree.  Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, a person sentenced pursuant to this subsection shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment, unless the court is clearly convinced that the interests of justice so far outweigh the need to deter this conduct and the interest in public safety that a sentence to imprisonment would be a manifest injustice.  Nothing in this subsection shall preclude subjecting a person who violates any condition of a special sentence of parole supervision for life to the provisions of sections 16 through 19 and 21 of P.L.1979, c.441 (C.30:4-123.60 through 30:4-123.63 and C.30:4-123.65) pursuant to the provisions of subsection c. of section 3 of P.L.1997, c.117 (C.30:4-123.51b).

    e.A person who, while serving a special sentence of parole supervision for life imposed pursuant to this section, commits a violation of N.J.S.2C:11-3, N.J.S.2C:11-4, N.J.S.2C:11-5, subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:12-1, N.J.S.2C:13-1, N.J.S.2C:13-6, N.J.S.2C:14-2, N.J.S.2C:14-3, N.J.S.2C:24-4, N.J.S.2C:18-2 when the offense is a crime of the second degree, or subsection a. of N.J.S.2C:39-4 shall be sentenced to an extended term of imprisonment as set forth in N.J.S.2C:43-7, which term shall, notwithstanding the provisions of N.J.S.2C:43-7 or any other law, be served in its entirety prior to the person's resumption of the term of parole supervision for life.

    L.1994,c.130,s.2; amended 2003, c.267, s.1.

    2C:43-7     Sentence of imprisonment for crime; extended terms.
    a. In the cases designated in section 2C:44-3, a person who has been convicted of a crime may be sentenced, and in the cases designated in subsection e. of section 2 of P.L.1994, c.130 (C.2C:43-6.4), in subsection b. of section 2 of P.L.1995, c.126 (C.2C:43-7.1) and in the cases designated in section 1 of P.L.1997, c.410 (C.2C:44-5.1), a person who has been convicted of a crime shall be sentenced, to an extended term of imprisonment, as follows:
    (3) In the case of a crime of the second degree, for a term which shall be fixed by the court between 10 and 20 years;
    (4) In the case of a crime of the third degree, for a term which shall be fixed by the court between five and 10 years;
    (5) In the case of a crime of the fourth degree pursuant to 2C:43-6c, 2C:43-6g and 2C:44-3d for a term of five years, and in the case of a crime of the fourth degree pursuant to any other provision of law for a term which shall be fixed by the court between three and five years;
    b. As part of a sentence for an extended term and notwithstanding the provisions of 2C:43-9, the court may fix a minimum term not to exceed one-half of the term set pursuant to subsection a. during which the defendant shall not be eligible for parole or a term of 25 years during which time the defendant shall not be eligible for parole where the sentence imposed was life imprisonment; provided that no defendant shall be eligible for parole at a date earlier than otherwise provided by the law governing parole.
    c. In the case of a person sentenced to an extended term pursuant to 2C:43-6c, 2C:43-6f and 2C:44-3d, the court shall impose a sentence within the ranges permitted by 2C:43-7a(2), (3), (4) or (5) according to the degree or nature of the crime for which the defendant is being sentenced, which sentence shall include a minimum term which shall, except as may be specifically provided by N.J.S.2C:43-6f, be fixed at or between one-third and one-half of the sentence imposed by the court or five years, whichever is greater, during which the defendant shall not be eligible for parole.  Where the sentence imposed is life imprisonment, the court shall impose a minimum term of 25 years during which the defendant shall not be eligible for parole, except that where the term of life imprisonment is imposed on a person convicted for a violation of N.J.S.2C:35-3, the term of parole ineligibility shall be 30 years.
    d. In the case of a person sentenced to an extended term pursuant to N.J.S.2C:43-6g, the court shall impose a sentence within the ranges permitted by N.J.S.2C:43-7a(2), (3), (4) or (5) according to the degree or nature of the crime for which the defendant is being sentenced, which sentence shall include a minimum term which shall be fixed at 15 years for a crime of the first or second degree, eight years for a crime of the third degree, or five years for a crime of the fourth degree during which the defendant shall not be eligible for parole.  Where the sentence imposed is life imprisonment, the court shall impose a minimum term of 25 years during which the defendant shall not be eligible for parole, except that where the term of life imprisonment is imposed on a person convicted of a violation of N.J.S.2C:35-3, the term of parole eligibility shall be 30 years.

    2C:43-7.2     Mandatory service of 85% of sentence for certain offenses.
    a. A court imposing a sentence of incarceration for a crime of the first or second degree enumerated in subsection d. of this section shall fix a minimum term of 85% of the sentence imposed, during which the defendant shall not be eligible for parole.
    b. The minimum term required by subsection a. of this section shall be fixed as a part of every sentence of incarceration imposed upon every conviction of a crime enumerated in subsection d. of this section, whether the sentence of incarceration is determined pursuant to N.J.S.2C:43-6, N.J.S.2C:43-7, N.J.S.2C:11-3 or any other provision of law, and shall be calculated based upon the sentence of incarceration actually imposed. The provisions of subsection a. of this section shall not be construed or applied to reduce the time that must be served before eligibility for parole by an inmate sentenced to a mandatory minimum period of incarceration.  Solely for the purpose of calculating the minimum term of parole ineligibility pursuant to subsection a. of this section, a sentence of life imprisonment shall be deemed to be 75 years.
    c. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary and in addition to any other sentence imposed, a court imposing a minimum period of parole ineligibility of 85 percent of the sentence pursuant to this section shall also impose a five-year term of parole supervision if the defendant is being sentenced for a crime of the first degree, or a three-year term of parole supervision if the defendant is being sentenced for a crime of the second degree.  The term of parole supervision shall commence upon the completion of the sentence of incarceration imposed by the court pursuant to subsection a. of this section unless the defendant is serving a sentence of incarceration for another crime at the time he completes the sentence of incarceration imposed pursuant to subsection a., in which case the term of parole supervision shall commence immediately upon the defendant's release from incarceration.  During the term of parole supervision the defendant shall remain in release status in the community in the legal custody of the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and shall be supervised by the State Parole Board as if on parole and shall be subject to the provisions and conditions of section 3 of P.L.1997, c.117 (C.30:4-123.51b).
    d. The court shall impose sentence pursuant to subsection a. of this section upon conviction of the following crimes or an attempt or conspiracy to commit any of these crimes:
    (8) subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:14-2 and paragraph (1) of subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:14-2, sexual assault;
    (9) N.J.S.2C:15-1, robbery;
    (12) N.J.S.2C:18-2, burglary;
    (13) subsection a. of N.J.S.2C:20-5, extortion;
    (16) section 2 of P.L.2002, c.26 (C.2C:38-2), terrorism; or

    2C:43-12.     Supervisory treatment - pretrial intervention
    a. Public policy. The purpose of sections 2C:43-12 through 2C:43-22 of this chapter is to effectuate a Statewide program of Pretrial Intervention.  It is the policy of the State of New Jersey that supervisory treatment should ordinarily be limited to persons who have not previously been convicted of any criminal offense under the laws of New Jersey, or under any criminal law of the United States, or any other state when supervisory treatment would: 
    (1)  Provide applicants, on an equal basis, with opportunities to avoid ordinary prosecution by receiving early rehabilitative services or supervision, when such services or supervision can reasonably be expected to deter future criminal behavior by an applicant, and when there is apparent causal connection between the offense charged and the rehabilitative or supervisory need, without which cause both the alleged offense and the need to prosecute might not have occurred; or 
    (2)  Provide an alternative to prosecution for applicants who might be harmed by the imposition of criminal sanctions as presently administered, when such an alternative can be expected to serve as sufficient sanction to deter criminal conduct; or 
    (3)  Provide a mechanism for permitting the least burdensome form of prosecution possible for defendants charged with "victimless" offenses; or
    (4)  Provide assistance to criminal calendars in order to focus expenditure of criminal justice resources on matters involving serious criminality and severe correctional problems; or
    (5)  Provide deterrence of future criminal or disorderly behavior by an applicant in a program of supervisory treatment.
    b. Admission of an applicant into a program of supervisory treatment shall be measured according to the applicant's amenability to correction, responsiveness to rehabilitation and the nature of the offense.
    c. The decision and reasons therefor made by the designated judges (or assignment judges), prosecutors and program directors in granting or denying applications for supervisory treatment, in recommending and ordering termination from the program or dismissal of charges, in all cases shall be reduced to writing and disclosed to the applicant. 
    d. If an applicant desires to challenge the decision of the prosecutor or program director not to recommend enrollment in a program of supervisory treatment the proceedings prescribed under section 14 shall be followed. 
    e. Referral.  At any time prior to trial but after the filing of a criminal complaint, or the filing of an accusation or the return of an indictment, with the consent of the prosecutor and upon written recommendation of the program director, the assignment judge or a judge designated by him may postpone all further proceedings against an applicant and refer said applicant to a program of supervisory treatment approved by the Supreme Court. Prosecutors and program directors shall consider in formulating their recommendation of an applicant's participation in a supervisory treatment program, among others, the following criteria: 
    (1)  The nature of the offense;
    (2)  The facts of the case;
    (3)  The motivation and age of the defendant;
    (4)  The desire of the complainant or victim to forego prosecution;
    (5)  The existence of personal problems and character traits which may be related to the applicant's crime and for which services are unavailable within the criminal justice system, or which may be provided more effectively through supervisory treatment and the probability that the causes of criminal behavior can be controlled by proper treatment; 
    (6)  The likelihood that the applicant's crime is related to a condition or situation that would be conducive to change through his participation in supervisory treatment;
    (7)  The needs and interests of the victim and society;
    (8)  The extent to which the applicant's crime constitutes part of a continuing pattern of anti-social behavior;
    (9)  The applicant's record of criminal and penal violations and the extent to which he may present a substantial danger to others;
    (10) Whether or not the crime is of an assaultive or violent nature, whether in the criminal act itself or in the possible injurious consequences of such behavior;
    (11) Consideration of whether or not prosecution would exacerbate the social problem that led to the applicant's criminal act;
    (12) The history of the use of physical violence toward others;
    (13) Any involvement of the applicant with organized crime;
    (14) Whether or not the crime is of such a nature that the value of supervisory treatment would be outweighed by the public need for prosecution;
    (15) Whether or not the applicant's involvement with other people in the crime charged or in other crime is such that the interest of the State would be best served by processing his case through traditional criminal justice system procedures; 
    (16) Whether or not the applicant's participation in pretrial intervention will adversely affect the prosecution of codefendants; and
    (17) Whether or not the harm done to society by abandoning criminal prosecution would outweigh the benefits to society from channeling an offender into a supervisory treatment program.
    f. Review of Supervisory Treatment Applications; Procedure Upon Denial. Each applicant for supervisory treatment shall be entitled to full and fair consideration of his application.  If an application is denied, the program director or the prosecutor shall precisely state his findings and conclusion which shall include the facts upon which the application is based and the reasons offered for the denial.  If the applicant desires to challenge the decision of a program director not to recommend, or of a prosecutor not to consent to, enrollment into a supervisory treatment program, a motion shall be filed before the designated judge (or assignment judge) authorized pursuant to the rules of court to enter orders. 
    g. Limitations.  Supervisory treatment may occur only once with respect to any defendant and any person who has previously received supervisory treatment under section 27 of P.L.1970, c.226 (C.24:21-27), shall not be eligible for supervisory treatment under this section. However, supervisory treatment, as provided herein, shall be available to a defendant irrespective of whether the defendant contests his guilt of the charge or charges against him. 
    h. Termination.  Termination of supervisory treatment under this section shall be immediately reported to the assignment judge of the county who shall forward such information to the Administrative Director of the Courts. 
    i. Appointment of Program Directors; Authorized Referrals. Programs of supervisory treatment and appointment of the program directors require approval by the Supreme Court with the consent of the assignment judge and prosecutor. Referrals of participants from supervisory treatment programs may be to any public or private office or agency, including but not limited to, programs within the probation service of the court, offering counseling or any other social service likely to aid in the rehabilitation of the participant and to deter the commission of other offenses. 
    j. Health Care Professional Licensing Board Notification.  The program director shall promptly notify the State Board of Medical Examiners when a State licensed physician or podiatrist has been enrolled in a supervisory treatment program after he has been charged with an offense involving drugs or alcohol. 

    2C:43-13.     Supervisory treatment procedure
    a. Agreement. The terms and duration of the supervisory treatment shall be set forth in writing, signed by the prosecutor and agreed to and signed by the participant.  Payment of the assessment required by section 2 of P.L.1979, c.396 (C.2C:43-3.1) shall be included as a term of the agreement.  If the participant is represented by counsel, defense counsel shall also sign the agreement.  Each order of supervisory treatment shall be filed with the county clerk.
    b. Charges.  During a period of supervisory treatment the charge or charges on which the participant is undergoing supervisory treatment shall be held in an inactive status pending termination of the supervisory treatment pursuant to subsection d. or e. of this section. 
    c. Period of treatment.  Supervisory treatment may be for such period, as determined by the designated judge or the assignment judge, not to exceed three years, provided, however, that the period of supervisory treatment may be shortened or terminated as the program director may determine with the consent of the prosecutor and the approval of the court. 
    d. Dismissal.  Upon completion of supervisory treatment, and with the consent of the prosecutor, the complaint, indictment or accusation against the participant may be dismissed with prejudice. 
    e. Violation of conditions.  Upon violation of the conditions of supervisory treatment, the court shall determine, after summary hearing, whether said violation warrants the participant's dismissal from the supervisory treatment program or modification of the conditions of continued participation in that or another supervisory treatment program. Upon dismissal of the participant from the supervisory treatment program, the charges against the participant may be reactivated and the prosecutor may proceed as though no supervisory treatment had been commenced. 
    f. Evidence.  No statement or other disclosure by a participant undergoing supervisory treatment made or disclosed to the person designated to provide such supervisory treatment shall be disclosed, at any time, to the prosecutor in connection with the charge or charges against the participant, nor shall any such statement or disclosure be admitted as evidence in any civil or criminal proceeding against the participant. Nothing provided herein, however, shall prevent the person providing supervisory treatment from informing the prosecutor, or the court, upon request or otherwise as to whether or not the participant is satisfactorily responding to supervisory treatment. 
    g. Delay.  No participant agreeing to undergo supervisory treatment shall be permitted to complain of a lack of speedy trial for any delay caused by the commencement of supervisory treatment. 
    A person applying for admission to a program of supervisory treatment shall pay to the court a fee of $75.00.  The court shall forward all money collected under this subsection to the treasurer of the county in which the court is located.  This money shall be used to defray the cost of juror compensation within that county.  A person may apply for a waiver of this fee, by reason of poverty, pursuant to the Rules Governing the Courts of the State of New Jersey.  Of the moneys collected under this subsection, $30.00 of each application fee shall be deposited in the temporary reserve fund created by section 25 of P.L.1993, c.275.  After December 31, 1994,the $75.00 fee shall be paid to the court, for use by the State. 

    2C:44-1.     Criteria for withholding or imposing sentence of imprisonment
    a. In determining the appropriate sentence to be imposed on a person who has been convicted of an offense, the court shall consider the following aggravating circumstances:
    (1) The nature and circumstances of the offense, and the role of the actor therein, including whether or not it was committed in an especially heinous, cruel, or depraved manner;
    (2) The gravity and seriousness of harm inflicted on the victim, including whether or not the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the victim of the offense was particularly vulnerable or incapable of resistance due to advanced age, ill-health, or extreme youth, or was for any other reason substantially incapable of exercising normal physical or mental power of resistance;
    (3) The risk that the defendant will commit another offense;
    (4) A lesser sentence will depreciate the seriousness of the defendant's offense because it involved a breach of the public trust under chapters 27 and 30, or the defendant took advantage of a position of trust or confidence to commit the offense;
    (5) There is a substantial likelihood that the defendant is involved in organized criminal activity;
    (6) The extent of the defendant's prior criminal record and the seriousness of the offenses of which he has been convicted;
    (7) The defendant committed the offense pursuant to an agreement that he either pay or be paid for the commission of the offense and the pecuniary incentive was beyond that inherent in the offense itself;
    (8) The defendant committed the offense against a police or other law enforcement officer, correctional employee or fireman, acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority; the defendant committed the offense because of the status of the victim as a public servant; or the defendant committed the offense against a sports official, athletic coach or manager, acting in or immediately following the performance of his duties or because of the person's status as a sports official, coach or manager;
    (9) The need for deterring the defendant and others from violating the law;
    (10) The offense involved fraudulent or deceptive practices committed against any department or division of State government;
    (11) The imposition of a fine, penalty or order of restitution without also imposing a term of imprisonment would be perceived by the defendant or others merely as part of the cost of doing business, or as an acceptable contingent business or operating expense associated with the initial decision to resort to unlawful practices;
    (12) The defendant committed the offense against a person who he knew or should have known was 60 years of age or older, or disabled; and
    (13) The defendant, while in the course of committing or attempting to commit the crime, including the immediate flight therefrom, used or was in possession of a stolen motor vehicle.
    b. In determining the appropriate sentence to be imposed on a person who has been convicted of an offense, the court may properly consider the following mitigating circumstances:
    (1) The defendant's conduct neither caused nor threatened serious harm;
    (2) The defendant did not contemplate that his conduct would cause or threaten serious harm;
    (3) The defendant acted under a strong provocation;
    (4) There were substantial grounds tending to excuse or justify the defendant's conduct, though failing to establish a defense;
    (5) The victim of the defendant's conduct induced or facilitated its commission;
    (6) The defendant has compensated or will compensate the victim of his conduct for the damage or injury that he sustained, or will participate in a program of community service;
    (7) The defendant has no history of prior delinquency or criminal activity or has led a law-abiding life for a substantial period of time before the commission of the present offense;
    (8) The defendant's conduct was the result of circumstances unlikely to recur;
    (9) The character and attitude of the defendant indicate that he is unlikely to commit another offense;
    (10) The defendant is particularly likely to respond affirmatively to probationary treatment;
    (11) The imprisonment of the defendant would entail excessive hardship to himself or his dependents;
    (12) The willingness of the defendant to cooperate with law enforcement authorities;
    (13) The conduct of a youthful defendant was substantially influenced by another person more mature than the defendant.
    c. (1) A plea of guilty by a defendant or failure to so plead shall not be considered in withholding or imposing a sentence of imprisonment.
    (2) When imposing a sentence of imprisonment the court shall consider the defendant's eligibility for release under the law governing parole, including time credits awarded pursuant to Title 30 of the Revised Statutes, in determining the appropriate term of imprisonment.
    d. Presumption of imprisonment.  The court shall deal with a person who has been convicted of a crime of the first or second degree by imposing a sentence of imprisonment unless, having regard to the character and condition of the defendant, it is of the opinion that his imprisonment would be a serious injustice which overrides the need to deter such conduct by others. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection e. of this section, the court shall deal with a person who has been convicted of theft of a motor vehicle or of the unlawful taking of a motor vehicle and who has previously been convicted of either offense by imposing a sentence of imprisonment unless, having regard to the character and condition of the defendant, it is of the opinion that his imprisonment would be a serious injustice which overrides the need to deter such conduct by others.
    e. The court shall deal with a person convicted of an offense other than a crime of the first or second degree, who has not previously been convicted of an offense, without imposing a sentence of imprisonment unless, having regard to the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history, character and condition of the defendant, it is of the opinion that his imprisonment is necessary for the protection of the public under the criteria set forth in subsection a., except that this subsection shall not apply if the person is convicted of any of the following crimes of the third degree: theft of a motor vehicle; unlawful taking of a motor vehicle; eluding; if the person is convicted of a crime of the third degree constituting use of a false government  document in violation of subsection c. of section 1 of P.L.1983, c.565 (C.2C:21-2.1); if the person is convicted of a crime of the third degree constituting distribution, manufacture or possession of an item containing personal identifying  information in violation of subsection b.of section 6 of P.L.2003, c.184 (C.2C:21-17.3); or if the person is convicted of a crime of the third or fourth degree constituting bias intimidation in violation of N.J.S.2C:16-1; or if the person is convicted of a crime of the third or fourth degree under the provisions of section 1 or 2 of P.L.1997, c.111 (C.2C:11-5.1 or 2C:12-1.1).
    f. Presumptive Sentences. (1) Except for the crime of murder, unless the preponderance of aggravating or mitigating factors, as set forth in subsections a. and b., weighs in favor of a higher or lower term within the limits provided in N.J.S.2C:43-6, when a court determines that a sentence of imprisonment is warranted, it shall impose sentence as follows:
    (a) To a term of 20 years for aggravated manslaughter or kidnaping pursuant to paragraph
    (1) of subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:13-1 when the offense constitutes a crime of the first degree;
    (b) Except as provided in paragraph
    (a) of this subsection to a term of 15 years for a crime of the first degree;
    (c) To a term of seven years for a crime of the second degree;
    (d) To a term of four years for a crime of the third degree; and
    (e) To a term of nine months for a crime of the fourth degree.
    In imposing a minimum term pursuant to 2C:43-6b., the sentencing court shall specifically place on the record the aggravating factors set forth in this section which justify the imposition of a minimum term.
    Unless the preponderance of mitigating factors set forth in subsection b. weighs in favor of a lower term within the limits authorized, sentences imposed pursuant to 2C:43-7a.(1) shall have a presumptive term of life imprisonment.  Unless the preponderance of aggravating and mitigating factors set forth in subsections a. and b. weighs in favor of a higher or lower term within the limits authorized, sentences imposed pursuant to 2C:43-7a.(2) shall have a presumptive term of 50 years' imprisonment; sentences imposed pursuant to 2C:43-7a.(3) shall have a presumptive term of 15 years' imprisonment; and sentences imposed pursuant to 2C:43-7a.(4) shall have a presumptive term of seven years' imprisonment.
    In imposing a minimum term pursuant to 2C:43-7b., the sentencing court shall specifically place on the record the aggravating factors set forth in this section which justify the imposition of a minimum term.
    (2) In cases of convictions for crimes of the first or second degree where the court is clearly convinced that the mitigating factors substantially outweigh the aggravating factors and where the interest of justice demands, the court may sentence the defendant to a term appropriate to a crime of one degree lower than that of the crime for which he was convicted.  If the court does impose sentence pursuant to this paragraph, or if the court imposes a noncustodial or probationary sentence upon conviction for a crime of the first or second degree, such sentence shall not become final for 10 days in order to permit the appeal of such sentence by the prosecution.
    g. Imposition of Noncustodial Sentences in Certain Cases.  If the court, in considering the aggravating factors set forth in subsection a., finds the aggravating factor in paragraph a.(2) or a.(12) and does not impose a custodial sentence, the court shall specifically place on the record the mitigating factors which justify the imposition of a noncustodial sentence.
    h. Except as provided in section 2 of P.L.1993, c.123 (C.2C:43-11), the presumption of imprisonment as provided in subsection d. of this section shall not preclude the admission of a person to the Intensive Supervision Program, established pursuant to the Rules Governing the Courts of the State of New Jersey.

    2C:44-2.     Criteria for Imposing Fines and Restitutions
    a. The court may sentence a defendant to pay a fine in addition to a sentence of imprisonment or probation if:
    (1) The defendant has derived a pecuniary gain from the offense or the court is of opinion that a fine is specially adapted to deterrence of the type of offense involved or to the correction of the offender;
    (2) The defendant is able, or given a fair opportunity to do so, will be able to pay the fine; and
    (3) The fine will not prevent the defendant from making restitution to the victim of the offense.
    b. The court shall sentence a defendant to pay restitution in addition to a sentence of imprisonment or probation that may be imposed if:
    (1) The victim, or in the case of a homicide, the nearest relative of the victim, suffered a loss; and
    (2) The defendant is able to pay or, given a fair opportunity, will be able to pay restitution.
    c. (1) In determining the amount and method of payment of a fine, the court shall take into account the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the burden that its payment will impose.
    (2) In determining the amount and method of payment of restitution, the court shall take into account all financial resources of the defendant, including the defendant's likely future earnings, and shall set the amount of restitution so as to provide the victim with the fullest compensation for loss that is consistent with the defendant's ability to pay. The court shall not reduce a restitution award by any amount that the victim has received from the Violent Crimes Compensation Board, but shall order the defendant to pay any restitution ordered for a loss previously compensated by the Board to the Violent Crimes Compensation Board. If restitution to more than one person is set at the same time, the court shall set priorities of payment.
    d. Nonpayment. When a defendant is sentenced to pay a fine or make restitution, or both, the court shall not impose at the same time an alternative sentence to be served in the event that the fine or restitution is not paid. The response of the court to nonpayment shall be determined only after the fine or restitution has not been paid, as provided in section 2C:46-2.
    e. Whenever the maximum potential fine which may be imposed on a conviction for an offense defined in the "Comprehensive Drug Reform Act of 1986," N.J.S. 2C:35-1 et al. depends on the street value of the controlled dangerous substance or controlled substance analog involved and the court intends to impose a fine in excess of the maximum ordinary fine applicable to the offense for which defendant was convicted, and where the fine has not been agreed to pursuant to the provisions of N.J.S.2C:35-12, the court at the time of sentence shall determine the street value at the time and place of the offense based on the amount and purity of the controlled dangerous substance or controlled substance analog involved. The sentencing court's finding as to the street value may be based on expert opinion in the form of live testimony or by affidavit, or by such other means as the court deems appropriate. The court's finding as to street value shall not be subject to modification by an appellate court except upon a showing that the finding was totally lacking in support on the record or was arbitrary or capricious.
    f. The ordering of restitution pursuant to this section shall not operate as a bar to the seeking of civil recovery by the victim based on the incident underlying the criminal conviction. Restitution ordered under this section is to be in addition to any civil remedy which a victim may possess, but any amount due the victim under any civil remedy shall be reduced by the amount ordered under this section to the extent necessary to avoid double compensation for the same loss, and the initial restitution judgment shall remain in full force and effect.